Skip to content

Obama Allows States to Opt Out of NCLB – With Strings Attached

September 28, 2011

USAToday has a story about Obama allowing the waivers to the onerous rules in NCLB, like 100% proficiency.  What is a huge disappointment is that with the ability to receive a waiver, there are strings attached.  Strings like tying teacher evaluations to test scores, which I have discussed here many times as not being supported by any empirical research.  I think this has more to do with Arne Duncan than Obama, but it is still terrible policy.

On Friday, Obama said he would give states a pass on much of the 2002 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law — most notably the requirement that students make large annual gains on math and reading tests. He also would waive the requirement that virtually every student be “proficient” in the two subjects by 2014.

Congress is due to reauthorize the law, but progress has stalled.

Critics of the law, including New York Universityeducation historian Diane Ravitch, say its steep improvement curve is nearly impossible to meet and time spent on test prep takes away from other subjects and narrows school curricula.

Obama said he would waive the proficiency requirements in exchange for a promise that states adopt several reforms, including higher academic standards, a teacher evaluation system based on student test scores and a promise to intervene in the lowest-performing schools.

National Education Association President Dennis Van Roekel praised Obama’s offer. “We needed to do this,” he said, adding he hopes it’ll help generate “common-sense measures” on school improvement from local districts.

Jack Jennings of the Center on Education Policy, a think tank, said the move will please teachers. Even though much of the law’s structure would remain in place, he said, “some of the draconian nature of NCLB will be eliminated.”

California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson on Friday posted a message on his Facebook page saying the waiver “would appear to cost billions of dollars to fully implement, at a time when California and many other states remain in financial crisis.”

Torlakson said he hoped Obama “is prepared to provide the funds necessary to implement these provisions, or provide greater flexibility to California, which already has a strong school accountability system in place.”

Under NCLB, states must set aside about $1billion for tutoring and school transfers — two provisions that would go away under the waivers. But the price tag for new evaluation and data systems could give a few states second thoughts, said Chris Minnich of the Council of Chief State School Officers. Minnich said most states have expressed “heavy interest” in the waivers. But the biggest expense could be a new data system, which many states don’t currently have.

 

Advertisements

From → Archives

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: