Skip to content

More on the Movie: “Won’t Back Down”…”Shamefully Manipulative”…”Hopelessly Bogus”

September 29, 2012

Well, I am happy that Kenneth Turan, the respected Film Critic for the LA Times easily identifies the movie “Won’t Back Down” for what it is…“this poor film is so shamelessly manipulative and hopelessly bogus it will make you bite your tongue in regret and despair.”  I couldn’t have said it any better Mr. Turan…seriously!

'Won't Back Down'

Don’t believe what Hollywood puts out – teachers are hard-working and dedicated public servants…

By Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times Film CriticSeptember 27, 2012, 3:50 p.m.

 When movies are at their most mindless, i.e. much of the time, it’s tempting to wish things could be otherwise. What adult moviegoer hasn’t hoped Hollywood could rouse itself at least every once in awhile to pay attention to the issues of the day.

But while the hot button-hugging “Won’t Back Down” would seem to do just that, it also serves to warn us to be careful what we wish for. This poor film is so shamelessly manipulative and hopelessly bogus it will make you bite your tongue in regret and despair.

Nominally “inspired by actual events” (though even fantasies like Quentin Tarantino‘s “Inglourious Basterds” could make that claim), “Won’t Back Down” wastes any number of capable actors, starting with stars Maggie Gyllenhaal andViola Davis, on a story that mixes simple-minded analysis of a complex problem with melodramatic contrivances Michael Bay might be ashamed to use.

That problem, which has been all over newspaper front pages and op-ed sections in recent weeks, is the crisis in American education. “Won’t Back Down” avoids the most controversial aspect of the current situation — whether teachers should be held directly accountable if student standardized test scores are weak — but it has no hesitation about creating a villain for all seasons: teachers unions.

Yes, the villain is always the unions…such BULL-SHIT!  Unions built this country, unions are responsible for the weekends that most people enjoy, unions are the reason workers have medical care and some modicum of comfort in retirement…UNIONS ARE GOOD FOR WORKERS AND THE MIDDLE CLASS…PERIOD!

Of course, you wouldn’t know that from the film’s press material, which avoids the word “union” like the plague. (Financier Walden Media was also responsible for the pro-school privatization documentary “Waiting for Superman.”) Or from co-writer (with Brin Hill) and director Daniel Barnz, who has been inexplicably quoted as saying he is “extremely pro-union.” And the truth is, if “Won’t Back Down” were an exciting, involving story, its political orientation wouldn’t be an issue. But it isn’t.

Pittsburgh single mom Jamie Fitzpatrick (Gyllenhaal) isn’t thinking about unions when the film starts. She’s trying to hold her salt-of-the-earth life together, juggling not one but two impeccably blue-collar jobs (used-car lot receptionist by day, bartender by night) while worrying that her daughter Malia (Emily Alyn Lind) isn’t getting a good education.

In fact, young Malia is getting the world’s worst education, courtesy of Adams Elementary, labeled a failing school for 19 years and counting. Worse than that, Malia has a monster of malfeasance for her teacher, a woman who, brazenly protected by union seniority, texts while her students create chaos, refuses to let them go to the bathroom and insists that union rules prevent her from working past 3 p.m. (American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten flatly calls this particular claim “an egregious lie.”)

Equally unhappy about her life is Nona Alberts (Viola Davis, vibrant as ever even in a thankless role). She’s an Adams teacher but is so troubled by the school’s failings, as well as a host of personal problems (she and her husband, played by “The Wire’s” Lance Reddick, are splitting), that she walks through the halls like a zombie.

Desperate to improve her daughter’s chances, Jamie gets a break when someone at the board of education tells her about a new law that allows a combination of parents and teachers to take over a school and turn it around. (Similar statutes called “parent trigger” laws do exist in several states, including California, but no group has been able to put them into practice yet.)

Nothing if not determined, not to say manic, when her child’s welfare is at stake, Jamie decides to spearhead a school takeover movement, and she steamrollers Nona to be Ms. Inside to her Ms. Outside.

Never mind that everyone tells them the task is flat-out impossible, that the deck is stacked against them, that it takes years and years even to get to ‘No.’ Jamie, powered by an enthusiasm level that would shame the Energizer Bunny, won’t back down. If you are worried even the tiniest bit about her chances despite this tsunami of obstacles, Hollywood has a bridge in Brooklyn they’d love for you to buy.

Jamie even involves her brand new boyfriend Michael (Oscar Isaac), whose use of music in the classroom magically makes him the only effective teacher Adams has. Michael is one of a few characters who half-heartedly mouth pro-union platitudes in a feeble attempt to give labor equal time, but his enthusiasm for solidarity isn’t fated to last.

That’s because unions turn out to be the most pernicious of all the obstacles to healthy schools, worse even than the stick-in-the-mud school board. While no one, not even unions themselves these days, denies that there are things that must be changed about how they operate, the notion of them as total evil only makes perfect sense to companies that believe in unionless, private charter schools that increase profits by paying teachers whatever they can get away with.

The union in “Won’t Back Down,” the Teachers Assn. of Pennsylvania or TAP, is fictitious, as well it might be given the awful things it stoops to, including vicious character assassination and attempts to manipulate Jamie by appealing to the best interests of her beloved child. For shame, unions! For shame!

Though the film’s pernicious propagandistic bias is irritating and misleading, it can’t be overemphasized that what is really wrong with this film is how feeble it is dramatically. When Nora is trying to decide if she should work with Jamie, she remembers her mother’s question: “What are you going to do with your one and only life?” Anyone who values their one and only life would be well-advised not to spend two hours of it here.


From → Archives

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: